Astronomy - Stars

The home page for the Solar Data Analysis Center at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center includes current solar images in a variety of wavelengths. Since wavelength is inversely proportional to temperature, visible light images show the Sun's photosphere, ultraviolet images show the chromosphere and the transition region to the corona, which is seen in x-ray images.
(View Cosmos DVD 5, episode 9, on solar activity; mov of solar surface (source) and Hinode mpg of same (source); also Hinode mpg and magnetic field images from 12/13/06 flare (source) and Hinode mov of solar X-ray jets (source).)
The most recent complete solar cycle (seen here in 284 Angstroms) began in 1996:

(source).

Sunspot activity defines the solar cycle; note the Maunder Minimum between 1645 and 1715:

(source)

The "solar wind", particles streaming from the surface of the Sun, gives us auroras and comet tails. It is a ubiquitous phenomenon, especially in hot young stars like LL Orionis:

(source)

Even radiation pressure sculpts the interstellar medium.


Spectrum Viewer Java Applet

The following applet can supply images, parallax (when known) and radiation flux information, along with digital spectra, of 46 stars covering the seven major stellar types. It also knows 1226 spectral lines associated with 34 elements, ions and molecules commonly found in stellar atmospheres. It allows you to fit a black body distribution to the spectrum, to investigate portions of the spectra in detail, and it allows you to fit a Gaussian distribution to individual lines to quantify line broadening.

The spectral data varies in resolution and coverage among the stars: some spectra include ultraviolet and/or infrared wavelengths while others cover only part of the optical spectrum. All are flux-calibrated, meaning that the flux values have calibrated physical units of Watts per square meter per Angstrom. Some of the original spectra were compiled at resolutions greater than the applet's finest resolution of one value per Angstrom, and those spectra have been smoothed for our use here. In addition, some spectra have been truncated because of the applet's limited color resolution: it can show only 256 levels of intensity for any given hue.

Begin by choosing a star from the pop-up menu. An image of the star will be displayed and, for most stars, the measured annual parallax angle and absolute error in that measurement will be displayed in the text box to the right of the image.

Note that the image is not, except in the case of Sol, an image of the stellar surface. It is actually a diffraction pattern with a strong, wide central maximum (the central circular "image") and in most cases indiscernible secondary maxima.
For all stars, the text box will also contain the minimum and maximum flux values over the range of the displayed spectrum, along with the total flux over that range.

Below this is another pop-up menu which selects an element (or ion or molecule) for spectral line identification, followed by a button and scroll bar enabling a black body temperature fit to the spectrum. Beneath those are three displays. The top display shows the spectral lines associated with the element selected (they are displayed as emission lines, that is, bright against a black background). Below that is a reconstructed color image of the actual spectra (wavelengths in the ultraviolet and infrared are displayed in shades of gray). Finally there is a graph of the flux as a function of wavelength:

You need a Java-capable browser to be able to use the applets. If they do not work with your Windows system, download the Java VM (Virtual Machine) for your version of Windows at the download section at java.sun.com.

You may click on either the spectrum image or graph to mark a central wavelength value on which to focus for detailed inquiries. The "Zoom In" and "Zoom Out" buttons allow you to quickly change the range of wavelengths displayed about that central value, and the values of the wavelength at the left and right edges of the graphs are displayed to the right of those buttons. The scroll bar labeled "Central lambda" allows you to smoothly vary the central value, and the value of the flux at the central wavelength is displayed to the right of the central lambda value. Finally, the "Gaussian Fit" button draws a Gaussian fit to the spectrum graph centered on the central lambda value, with a standard deviation as specified by the scroll bar to the right.

(source, source, source, source, source, source, source)


Absorption Lines and Temperature

The Spectrum Viewer will allow you to analyze spectra of several stars in detail. Using the energy flux and parallax data it provides, we can compute a star's luminosity using the equation
energy flux = luminosity / (4 p distance2)
Using values from the Spectrum Viewer for the star 108 Virginis, we see from its parallax (5.31 mas) that its
distance from Earth is
r = 1000 / 5.31 = 188.3 parsecs, times 3.084 * 1016 m/parsec
= 5.81 * 1018 m
The Viewer also tells us that its total flux is 9.9775 * 10-11 W/m2, so its luminosity is
L = 4 p * (5.81 * 1018 m)2 * 9.9775 * 10-11 W/m2
= 4.23 * 1028 W, divided by 3.85 * 1026 W for our Sun

= 110 Lsolar

Note that we do not have a "complete" spectrum; there appears to be additional flux in the ultraviolet that is missing from the data for this star. Because of this, we have really underestimated the luminosity of this star.

We can find the effective temperature of a star as follows. Use the "Black Body" button and adjust the temperature scroll bar so that the black body curve is as close to the spectrum as possible. Since a star is not a perfect black body, we have some choices here: we can match the peak wavelength (in this example, around 3970 Angstroms, giving us a temperature of 7300 K) or we can match the leading or trailing slope (in this example, closer to 9300 K). In general, matching the trailing slope tends to be more accurate than the other options.

A given atom, ion or molecule only exists in a star's atmosphere for a range of temperatures. For lower temperatures, an ion may become neutral, or for higher temperatures, an atom may become ionized, in either case changing the wavelengths of its absorption lines. At sufficiently high temperatures, molecules will break up and their lines (or bands) disappear altogether. We can use the following table to look for some characteristic lines as a check on our black body temperature. Choose the element from the drop-down menu ("Reference Spectra Element") and look for consistent matches for the lines displayed, indicating the presence of that element in the star's atmosphere. If the lines in the table are present, the temperature should be in or close to the range given, and if the lines are extremely strong (dark), the temperature should be close to the peak temperature. The wavelengths for the CH and TiO bands are the wavelengths at the left-hand edge of the bands.

specielines (Angstroms)T Range (K)Peak T (K)
H3966, 4097, 4336, 4856, 65555000-400009000
He4471, 454210000-5000029000
Ca42272000-55003000
Ca+3934, 39683000-70005000
Na5890, 58962000-55003000
Mg+2796, 2802, 4481, 51738000-300009200
Si+4128, 41318000-200009200
Si++455220000-4000025000
Si+++1394, 1403, 4089, 411630000-5000040000
Fe4045, 4143, 4299, 4325, 4384, 52702000-70004500
Fe+4173, 53164000-80005700
CH band4300-43155000-60005500
TiO bands4762, 4955, 5167, 5448, 5862, 6159, 63842000-40003000
Here are sample optical spectra arranged by spectral class; can you identify the prominent lines?

(source)

The spectrum for 108 Virginis is a low resolution spectrum, so all we can see are the broad Hydrogen lines, which do not help much in verifying our black body temperature. This check is much more useful with high resolution spectra, especially spectra in the visible and near ultraviolet.

With the temperature and the luminosity, we can compute the star's radius using

luminosity = 4 p s radius2 temperature4
Using our temperature of 9300 K for 108 Virginis (and 5.67 * 10-8 for s), we obtain
r = (4.23 * 1028 / 4 p s 93004)1/2
= 2.82 * 109 m, divided by the radius of our Sun (7 * 108 m)

= 4 rsolar

Since our estimate for the luminosity was low, this is an underestimate for the radius. But because of the square root, we are closer here than in our luminosity calculation (if the luminosity was off by a factor of 2, the radius will only be off by a factor of 21/2 = 1.414).

Note that the presence of metallic absorption lines indicates that the star is a later-generation star: the metals were inherited from earlier-generation stars.


Portfolio Exercise 1: You will be given a list of 9 stars which you are to analyze for each of the first 4 portfolio exercises. In this exercise, compute each star's distance in parsecs and in meters; compute each star's luminosity in both Watts and solar units; find the black body temperature for each star; and compute each star's radius, both in meters and in solar units.

Doppler Shift

Line of sight motion can be computed using the shift in the central wavelength of well-known absorption lines:
apparent wavelength / actual wavelength = 1 + recession velocity / c
If the apparent wavelength is shorter than the actual, the motion is toward us and the recession velocity is taken to be negative. The
Spectrum Viewer does not have sufficient resolution to enable us to compute recession shifts for any of the stars it has data for. But we will return to this computation when we discuss Cosmology.

The broadening of most narrow absorption lines is primarily due to the motion of the atoms involved, although pressure and other factors can be equally important. For instance, Hydrogen and Helium lines are broadened by the Stark Effect: since their nuclear charge is small, they are particularly susceptible to electric fields created by ions in the stellar atmosphere. These fields perturb their energy levels and are primarily responsible for their line broadening.

Atomic speeds in the photosphere can be estimated using the width of some absorption lines:

line width = 2 * speed * central wavelength / c
The line width is twice the standard deviation reported by the Spectrum Viewer.

The spectrum for 108 Virginis has too low a resolution to be able to compute Doppler Shifts; only the broad Hydrogen lines are present, and these are unsatisfactory for computing atomic velocities, because of the Stark Effect. But using the prominent Sodium line of Epsilon Indi (at 5890 Angstroms), we can compute an approximate speed for these atoms in the star's atmosphere as follows. Click on the graph at 5890 Angstroms, and "Zoom In"; if the central wavelength is not 5890, click again or use the "Central Lambda" scroll bar until it is. Then click the "Gaussian Fit" button; a small curve appears around the line. Change the Standard Deviation using the scroll bar until the curve is a close fit to the line on the graph. In this example, it is a close fit between 1.5 and 2.4. Taking the average (1.95), we compute the approximate speed of these atoms as

v = 1.95 * 3 * 108 / 5890 = 99000 m/s

Portfolio Exercise 2: Using both the Calcium lines near 3900 Angstroms, and the Sodium lines near 5900 Angstroms, compute the approximate atomic speeds from the line width, for each star. Are they consistent for each star? What does the range tell you about this computation?

Spectral Classes and Effective Temperatures

The following table gives the most likely effective temperature for each spectral class.
Spectral ClassT (Main Sequence)T (Giants)T (Supergiants)
O348000
O544000
O643000
O837000
B03100030000
B124100
B221080
B318000
B415870
B514720
B811950
A095729550
A289859000
A583068500
A779358300
F0717871788030
F2690969097780
F5652865287020
F8616061606080
G0594359435450
G2581158115080
G5565756574850
G8548654864700
K0528252824500
K2505550554400
K3497349734230
K5462346233900
K7438043803870
M0421242123850
M2407640763800
M539233923
M82400
Using our temperature of 9300 K, we see that 108 Virginis is likely close to a class A1 (interpolating between the temperatures for A0 and A2 in the table).


Magnitude, Luminosity Classes and Spectral Classes

If we know the luminosity, or the apparent magnitude and the distance to the star, we can compute the absolute magnitude using one of the equations
absolute magnitude = 4.83 - 2.5 * log10 luminositysolar

absolute magnitude = apparent magnitude + 5 - 5 * log10 distancepc

For 108 Virginis, at a distance of 188.3 parsecs and a luminosity of 110 Lsolar, we obtain an absolute magnitude
M = 4.83 - 2.5 * log10 110 = - 0.27
and an apparent magnitude of
m = - 0.27 - 5 + 5 * log 10 188.3 = 6.1
Since the absolute magnitude is the magnitude a star would have at a fixed distance of 10 parsecs, m will be larger than M if the star is more than 10 parsecs distant, and less than M if it is closer. Note that because of our underestimate of the luminosity, M is larger (less negative) than it should be, and m is also larger than it should be. Here the error is even less than in our radius calculation because the log function increases more slowly than the square root.

You can barely see a star of apparent magnitude 6 with your eyes, if you are in a region of dark skies. Under the same conditions, binoculars takes you to magnitude 10 and our 8 inch telescopes to about magnitude 13. The Hubble can just see objects of apparent magnitude 30.

The following table relates the absolute magnitude to the luminosity class for each spectral class (the magnitudes given are the most likely values for each class):

Spectral ClassM (Main Sequence)M (Giants)M (Supergiants)M (White Dwarfs)
O5-5.8
O6-4.8
O8-4.1
B0-3.3-6.410.2
B1-2.9
B2-2.5
B3-2.0
B4-1.5
B5-1.1
B80.0
A00.7-5.0
A21.3-5.0
A51.9-5.0
A72.3-4.9
F02.71.0-4.812.9
F23.00.9-4.8
F53.50.8-4.7
F84.00.7-4.6
G04.40.6-4.6
G24.70.5-4.6
G55.10.4-4.5
G85.60.3-4.5
K06.00.2-4.5
K26.50.1-4.5
K36.80.1-4.5
K57.50.0-4.5
K78.0-0.1-4.5
M08.8-0.2
M29.8-0.2
M512.0-0.2
M816.0
A white dwarf is a star which has collapsed to a small, hot cinder after fusion processes have stopped.
Using the estimated class A1 for 108 Virginis and our absolute magnitude of -0.27, we see that the value in the main sequence column (1) is closer than the value in the supergiant column (-5), so we suspect that 108 Virginis is a main sequence star. Since we have no data in the giant column, it could be a giant star, but it definitely is not a supergiant or white dwarf.

Standard luminosity classes are

    Ia - Bright Supergiants
  • Ib - Supergiants
  • II - Bright Giants
  • III - Giants
  • IV - Subgiants
  • V - Dwarfs (including Main Sequence Stars)

A spectral class beginning with "D" indicates a degenerate star, or white dwarf. Additional designations include e (has emission lines), n (has diffuse lines), p (has a peculiar spectrum; see, even physicists don't understand it all yet!), s (has sharp lines), and v (variable star).

Using
SIMBAD, you can look up the accepted spectral class for 108 Virginis. You will find it listed as "B9.5V". Our choice of A1 is very close to B9.5, and the "V" indicates a main sequence star, so our choice of luminosity class was correct (if a little lucky).


Portfolio Exercise 3: Using the information you have collected so far, assign a spectral class to each of your stars.

For each star, compute the absolute and apparent magnitudes. Assign a luminosity class to each star.

Look each star up on SIMBAD. Comment on your success rate.


Extinction

Taking the three equations above involving luminosity and magnitude, we see we have three equations in five unknowns: energy flux, luminosity, distance, absolute magnitude and apparent magnitude. So in principle, if we know any two of these quantities, we can use the three equations to compute the others. Photometry gives us the energy flux and apparent magnitude, so we seem to be home free. But there is an assumption that we have ignored, and which we must take into account: space is not entirely empty.

The volume in the immediate neighborhood of the Earth has a mean density of about 5 atoms per cubic centimeter (mostly Hydrogen (source); 1 cm3 = 10-6 m3). This falls to about 0.3 in the Solar neighborhood and to less than 0.001 in the "Local Bubble". In interstellar space the average density is around 1 atom per cm3, and it is even less in intergalactic space. Larger dust particles are about a million times rarer, except in nebulae and clouds, where the density runs between 10 to a million atoms, molecules or dust particles per cm3. But since space is so vast, some of the electromagnetic radiation traveling through the interstellar medium is absorbed, and because shorter wavelengths are scattered more than longer ones, there is additional attenuation in the red and infrared wavelengths. The overall loss is called extinction, and the preferential scattering causes reddening. Molecular Cloud Barnard 68 illustrates both phenomena.

While the spectra in the Spectrum Viewer have been corrected for extinction and reddening, it is important to know how astronomers can compute the necessary corrections. Armed with an independent measure of distance (for instance, from the parallax), we can compare the observed apparent magnitude with the expected apparent magnitude. The result is

extinction = (mobserved - mexpected) / distance
here measured in magnitudes per kiloparsec; note that it is a function of wavelength.

Spectral classification is particularly useful here. Along the main sequence of a Hertzsprung-Russell diagram, there is essentially a 1:1 correspondence between spectral class and absolute magnitude. Because of this, stars of a given spectral class but at various distances can be used to compute extinction. For instance, the star BD +31 640 is located in the open galactic cluster IC 348. It is an A3V star located 236 parsecs away, with an absolute magnitude of 1.5. This means the expected apparent magnitude (m = M - 5 + 5 log D) is

1.5 - 5 + 5 log 236 = 8.36
However, the observed apparent magnitude (measured near 5448 Angstroms, the effective wavelength for the V band) is 11.4 (source), meaning that the extinction is
(11.4 - 8.36) / 0.236 = 12.86 magnitudes / kpc
In this case, the extinction is due largely to an obvious cloud:

and it is more reasonable to quote the extinction simply as 3.04 magnitudes.


The Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram

Suppose you could take a picture of every person on Earth at a given instant of time. Armed only with that picture, you must find a model that explains the human life cycle, from conception to death. The Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram is like that picture, and with it we can learn some things about the lives of stars:

(source)

The position of a star on the main sequence (the line from upper left to lower right) is determined by its mass. Main sequence stars of spectral type G0 are about 1 Msolar, while those of type B0 are about 15 Msolar (stars begin their main sequence lives with masses varying from 0.04 to about 200 Msolar (source)). Almost half of the stars in the neighborhood of our Sun have a mass less than about a third of the Sun's; about one in 300 of the neighborhood stars have a mass in excess of 8 Msolar.

Straight diagonal lines parallel to the tangent at the center of the main sequence correspond roughly to lines of equal radius. Our B0 main sequence star has a radius around 10 Rsolar. The spacing of these lines of equal radius is roughly logarithmic.

The first thing to notice is that by far, most of the data points lie on the main sequence. Since we are looking at a population of stars at a different time in each star's life, that tells us that stars spend most of their lives on the main sequence. As a consequence, the (super)giant and white dwarf regions of the diagram must represent stars at various stages near the ends of their lives (assuming that most of the data points represent stars and not protostars).

Another thing to notice is that the white dwarf region of the diagram is distributed over a relatively wide range of luminosities and temperatures. This means that knowledge of temperature does not translate as easily into knowledge about luminosity as it does with main sequence stars. At first glance one might be tempted to say the same thing about the giant and supergiant regions, but because they represent definite paths in the life cycles of those stars, and the stars themselves are much larger and brighter, they do not represent so much of a problem. Because they are so small and relatively dim, white dwarfs are very hard to measure.


Stellar Evolution (I)

In general,
stellar lifetimeyears = 1010 masssolar / luminositysolar
Since luminosity is approximately equal to mass3.5 (in solar units), this is equivalent to
stellar lifetimeyears = 1010 / masssolar2.5
leading us to the conclusion that more massive stars burn out more quickly.

These graphs illustrate the lifetimes of stars of 0.5, 1, 1.5, 3, 5 and 9 solar masses, from various perspectives:

Numerical values in this section are approximate. Stellar life cycles are based on models described in 1965 and 1967 by Iben (Astrophysical Journal 141:993 and Annual Reviews of Astronomy and Astrophysics 5:571, respectively).


Nuclear Reactions

The primary source of the Sun's power output is the "proton-proton chain":

(The first two of these reactions occurs twice for each occurrence of the third reaction.)

In these nuclear reactions, the difference between the masses of the products and reactants can be used to compute the energy released by using
energy = mass * c2
Most people think of this as "converting matter into energy". Since energy is a quality of matter, and not really a separate entity, it is better to think of this process in terms of the constituent quarks of the protons and neutrons involved. Then we can see that each reactant has an energy content associated with the fact that they are bound states of particles which are electrically as well as strongly interacting. The product has a different binding energy, and the fusion process liberates the difference as gamma rays (with electromagnetic energy) and thermal energy of motion. The energy of any neutrinos which are produced is usually included as part of the energy released, because the neutrino has a very small and not very accurately measured mass in comparison with the other particles.
The mass of a proton (1H) is 1.673 * 10-27 kg; the mass of a Helium nucleus (4He) is 6.647 * 10-27 kg, and the mass of a positron (e+) is 9.109 * 10-31 kg. The energy released in neutrinos (ne) and gamma rays (g) is then
E = (4 * 1.673 * 10-27 - 6.647 * 10-27 - 2 * 9.109 * 10-31) * (3 * 108)2
= 3.881 * 10-12 J

(= 24.225 MeV)

Using the solar constant (1365 W/m2) as the energy flux and 1 AU as the distance in the equation below, we can compute the luminosity of the Sun, obtaining LS = 3.85 * 1026 W. Dividing the luminosity by the energy per reaction gives the number of reactions per second, 9.92 * 1037. Since each reaction consumes 4 protons, the rate of Hydrogen consumption is
9.92 * 1037 * 4 * 1.673 * 10-27
= 6.64 * 1011 kg / s.
In the following list of nuclear reactions occurring in stars, numbers in parentheses are approximate energy yields in MeV; negative values indicate additional energy is required to make these reactions occur. Note that these are not all of the possible reactions; any reaction which conserves energy, momentum, angular momentum, electric charge, baryon number (protons and neutrons are baryons) and lepton number (electrons, positrons and neutrinos are leptons) can occur. Each reaction occurs with different frequency based on how much energy is required to overcome the electric repulsion between nuclei before the strong force (which binds nuclei together) takes over.

The following masses (in "atomic mass units"; 1 amu = 1.66055 * 10-27 kg) will enable you to compute more accurate energy yields from these reactions.

n1.008715N14.996340Ca39.9516
1H1.0072515O14.998743Ti42.9564
2H2.0135516O15.990544Ti43.9476
3He3.014920Ne19.986947V46.9423
4He4.001523Na22.983848Cr47.9408
8Be8.0031123Mg22.987552Fe51.9338
12C11.996728Si27.97956Fe55.9206
13C13.000132S31.963356Co55.925
13N13.001936Ar35.957656Ni55.9267
14N13.9954

You can find the atomic numbers of these atoms from the Periodic Table of the Elements.

While neutron capture can form atoms with atomic masses larger than Iron, nuclear fusion ends with Iron production. This is because 56Fe fusion is an endothermic process: it takes more energy than it releases. While we have seen several such reactions above, they have proceeded because excess energy is available in the active core of the star. Once an Iron core forms, there are no reactions available to provide the additional energy necessary for Iron fusion to occur.
It is often said that 56Fe is the most stable nucleus. A nucleus is said to be stable if its energy per baryon is a minimum for its atomic number. Unstable nuclei undergo radioactive decay, emitting Helium nuclei (alpha decay, which heavier nuclei often do because they lose energy quicker), electrons or positrons (beta decay, accompanied by neutrinos), or photons (gamma decay, if nothing else is allowed). The reactions marked with an asterisk above are all beta decays. Fusion stops with Iron because 56Fe has the lowest energy per baryon of any nucleus.

Portfolio Exercise 4: For each of the nuclear reactions above, compute the energy yield.

Stellar Evolution (II)

The final fate of a star depends on its mass at the termination of fusion processes. Stars born with less than 8 solar masses experience a series of Helium shell flashes which cause the luminosity to fluctuate and the outer layers to be ejected, forming a planetary nebula:

IC 4406 (source)
These stars typically shed enough mass:

Eta Carinae (source)
so that their final mass is less than the Chandrasekhar Limit of 1.44 solar masses to become a white dwarf: the compressed core of the final fusion product:

NGC 2440 (source)
Stars born larger than 8 solar masses usually retain enough mass to undergo core collapse, with the resulting shock wave producing a Type Ib/c (with Helium lines) or a Type II (with Hydrogen lines) Supernova. If their final mass is less than 3-3.2* solar masses, the remnant will be a neutron star. If it is rotating, and has a sufficiently large magnetic field whose axis is not along the rotation axis, we may observe it as a pulsar. It is assumed that most if not all stars rotate, so by conservation of angular momentum, a collapsed core such as a white dwarf or neutron star will rotate much faster than its progenitor, by a factor of (rbefore/rafter)2.
*Most neutron star masses are close to 1.4 Msolar; the largest measured so far is about 2.1 Msolar. The actual limit depends on how neutron matter behaves, and is the subject of ongoing research.
If the final mass is greater than 3-3.2 solar masses, the remnant collapses behind the horizon of a black hole.

Sirius B is a white dwarf whose absolute magnitude is 11.2 and whose mass is approximately equal to that of our Sun. Its luminosity is then

L = 10(4.83 - M)/2.5
= 10-2.548 = 0.0028 Lsolar
Its black body temperature is around 14800 K, so its radius is
r = (L / (4 p s T4))1/2
= (0.0028 * 3.85 * 1026 / (4 p s 148004))1/2

= 5.62 * 106 m = 0.008 Rsolar

From this we can compute its average density
r = m / (4/3 p r3)
= 2 * 1030 / (4/3 p (5.62 * 106)3), times 0.001 to convert kg/m3 to g/cm3,

= 2.7 * 106 g / cm3 (!)

its escape velocity
escape velocity = (2 * G * mass / radius)1/2
= (2 * G * 2 * 1030 / 5.62 * 106)1/2

= 6.89 * 106 m/s

= 0.023 c,

and its surface gravity
surface gravity = G * mass / radius2
= G * 2 * 1030 / (5.62 * 106)2

= 4.23 * 106 m / s2,

which means that if you could survive on its surface, you would weight about 430 thousand times as much as you do on Earth! These values are typical orders of magnitude for white dwarfs:
White DwarfAbsolute MagnitudeMasssolarRadiussolar
40 Eridani B110.5010.0136
Procyon B13.20.6040.0096
Sirius B11.210.0084

(source)

Note that at 8.6 light years, Sirius B is the closest white dwarf to Earth. That, coupled with the fact that it is a binary partner to Sirius A, allows us to understand it much better than many other white dwarfs. Careful observation of their orbital period and separation was the key to computing its mass.

The neutron star at the heart of the Crab Nebula has about 1.4 times the mass of Sirius B but its radius is only about 10 kilometers. This is 560 times smaller, so its density is 250 million times larger, its escape velocity is 28 times larger (0.64 c) and its surface gravity is 440 thousand times greater! We have already seen the Crab Nebula in multiple wavelengths; here is an x-ray image of the neutron star and supernova remnant Cassiopeia A:

(source)

The planetary nebulas glow from irradiation by the remnant white dwarf or neutron star.

Now consider our old friend Betelgeuse. As we mentioned in the Introduction, it is an M2Ib star located 427.3 light years from us. Its temperature is about 4000 K, its mass is about 20 Msolar and its luminosity is about 50000 Lsolar. That means that its radius is

r = (50000 * 3.85 *1026 / (4 p s 40004))1/2
= 3.25 * 1011 m = 464 Rsolar
Since its luminosity is varying, we know it is in the horizontal branch, and it is estimated that within 10000 years it will explode as a supernova. Assuming the supernova has a peak luminosity of 1010 Lsolar, the energy flux we should experience here on Earth is
energy flux = luminosity / (4 p distance2)
= 1010 * 3.85 *1026 W / (4 p (427.3 ly * 9.461 * 1015 m/ly)2)

= 0.0187 W/m2

This may not seem like much compared to the total flux we receive from the Sun, but consider that much of this is in gamma radiation. If we assume the normal gamma flux is 5 MeV/cm2/s, or around 8 * 10-9 W/m2, this is a lot of radiation. The lesson here is that the neighborhood affected by a supernova is very large. In any given galaxy, every 30 to 50 years another star explodes as a supernova:

SN 1994D in NGC 4526 (source)
This makes the universe seem like a violent place, and it can be. But it is important to remember that the explosion of a supernova not only disrupts its neighborhood, but it also seeds the interstellar medium with heavier elements, and the shock waves compress that medium so that more stars can develop in the future:

(source).


Relativity and Black Holes

(View Cosmos DVD 6, episode 9, on Flatland and curved space.)
The Special Relativity Primer may be a good place to start trying to understand the idea of spacetime. The Relativity Playground may help you better understand the principles of General Relativity. Note that since mass is a scalar (having no directionality), it is a constant in every reference frame.

We define the future light cone of a particle to be the collection of all the places that particle might ever be at any given time in its future. The surface of the cone is where it could be if it travels at the speed of light, and the interior of the cone is where it could be if it travels more slowly. Therefore photons are destined to stay on the surface of their light cones and massive particles are destined to stay in the interior of their light cones.

All this means that you will indeed expire when you cross the horizon of a black hole. Assuming you cross feet first, the future light cone of your feet is pointing into the center of the black hole, so no nerve impulses can reach your head from there. When your heart crosses, no blood can flow from it to your head. And when your head crosses the horizon, the parts of your brain cannot communicate with each other and your consciousness ceases.

For a black hole of mass M and angular momentum L, the horizon is a spherical surface located at a distance

r = (G M2 + (G2 M4 - c2 L2)1/2) / (M c2)
from the center of the black hole. This is a complicated function, so we will specialize for a moment to the (probably) unphysical case of a static black hole, which does not spin. Its horizon is then at
r = 2 G M / c2
= 2953 meters * M / Msolar
Note that this implies that G / c2 is a conversion factor for converting mass to length.
Using this expression for r, the escape velocity at the horizon is
ev = (2 G M / r)1/2
= c
which is consistent with our notions a) of nothing (particularly light) being able to escape from inside the horizon of a black hole, and b) all light cones are tangent to the horizon of a black hole.

The surface gravity at the horizon is

g = c4 / (4 G M)
= 1.52 * 1013 m/s2 / (M / Msolar)
For M = 2 Msolar, this is almost 2 million times the surface gravity of Sirius B, and 4 times that of the neutron star in the center of the Crab Nebula. But there is a caveat for the neutron star: it is a pulsar, so we know it spins, and therefore using our simplistic version of the equation for the horizon is not exactly a valid comparison. However, even though the pulsar is spinning 30 times each second, the angular momentum term is less than 0.03% of the mass term, so this result is very close.

Consider now the tidal acceleration experienced by a 2-meter object at the horizon:

G M / r2 - G M / (r+2)2
= (c6 / (4 G M)) (c2 + 2 G M) / (c2 + G M)2
Since M is a multiple of Msolar, G M is much greater than c2, and this reduces to approximately
c6 / (2 G2 M2)
= 2 * 1010 / (M / Msolar)2
For M = 2 Msolar, this is about 5 * 109 m/s2. This means that our 2-meter object experiences a tidal acceleration over 500 million times Earth's surface gravity! But for M = 106 Msolar, the tidal acceleration is 0.02 m/s2: unnoticeable.

It is expected that many if not most galaxies harbor a supermassive black hole in their cores, probably surrounded by an accretion disc, whose matter is accelerated to relativistic speeds and radiates tremendous amounts of energy as it falls into the horizon:

(source)

(View movie of crab pulsar (source))
The disc-like disturbances around the pulsar and the accretion discs around the black holes are related in that the curvature of spacetime is essentially the same (except in magnitude) around all spinning masses. It is probable that most if not all of the violent events we see in the universe, from novae to gamma ray bursts, are powered by either stellar collapse, the accretion of matter onto a massive compact object like a white dwarf, neutron star or black hole, or mergers of same.
(View simulation of blazar BL Lac (source))

Portfolio Exercise 5: Find a white dwarf other than Sirius B and a neutron star other than the one at the heart of the Crab Nebula, and compute the following: its density, the escape velocity at its surface, and its surface gravity. For the white dwarf, you will need to know its radius and mass; you will have to find its mass (which means it will probably have to be a binary companion), and you can compute its radius if you find its absolute magnitude and temperature. For the neutron star, your source will have to provide its mass and radius.

Now compute the horizon radius for a black hole of mass equal to the masses of the white dwarf and neutron star you found. Using that radius, compute the escape velocity and surface gravity of the "equivalent" black hole. Express all escape velocities in terms of the speed of light, and all surface gravities in terms of Earth's surface gravity (9.8 m/s2).


Portfolio Exercise 6: Using the Relativity Playground: vary the initial position and speed to see how the escape velocity depends on distance from the horizon. Do this first for a = 0 and masses of 2, 2000 and 2000000 Msolar. Then set a = .9 M and do the same. Does the escape velocity depend on the mass? Does it matter whether the probes follow an azimuthal or polar orbit?


©2008, Kenneth R. Koehler. All Rights Reserved. This document may be freely reproduced provided that this copyright notice is included.

Please send comments or suggestions to the author.